Curriculum Brainstorm: Part One

Things I tried when I Was a High School Media Specialist

 

Curriculum Brainstorm: Part Two

Classification and Explication

Key:

CrQ is the Creative Thinking Quotient.
CtQ is the Critical Thinking Quotient.
CoQ is the Cooperative Learning Quotient.
All of these scores are listed on a scale of 0-10 with 10 being the highest.
SD refers to the most important Skills and Dispositions this activity fosters.
AT refers to the Activity Type(s).



Physics students work in groups to create and present mock-ups for Web pages on the science and history behind communication devices including television, communications satellites, radio, and video cameras; students are accountable for individual contributions.

CrQ: 7 CtQ: 9 CoQ: 8
SD: originality, evaluation, artistic, setting goals, recognizing essential/nonessential, sequencing information, interpreting
AT: creative writing, group decision-making, case-based learning,

Math and science teachers use a nominal-group process technique to arrive at a prioritized list of technology needs to submit to the superintendent.

CrQ: 5 CtQ: 9 CoQ: 8
SD: fluency, flexibility, evaluation, setting goals, predicting outcomes, identifying barriers
AT: brainstorming, nominal-group process

Marketing students work in groups to create and present mock-ups for Web pages to promote their companies; students are accountable for individual contributions.

CrQ: 7 CtQ: 7 CoQ: 7
SD: recognizing essential/nonessential, originality, evaluation, artistic, setting goals
AT: brainstorming, creative writing, group decision-making, case-based learning

Mass media students work in small groups to create video public service announcements for the library, which are broadcast on the morning announcements.

CrQ: 10 CtQ: 5 CoQ: 5
SD: originality, flexibility, evaluation, artistic, setting goals, recognizing essential/nonessential
AT: brainstorming, creative writing, group decision-making, case-based learning

Literature students work as a class to create a web-on-the-wall of potential research topics based on a novel they read.

CrQ: 6 CtQ: 9 CoQ: 3
SD: fluency, problem finding, attribute listing, discovering relationships, communicating relationships
AT: webbing, discussion

Students formulate reference questions to try to "Stump the Librarian."

CrQ: 10 CtQ: 6 CoQ: 0
SD: problem finding, predicting consequences
AT: brainstorming, inquiry

Second-grade students identify story elements by comparing fairy tales such as "Cinderella" and "The Three Little Pigs."

CrQ: 3 CtQ: 10 CoQ: 3
SD: logical thinking, flexibility, recognizing patterns, communicating relationships
AT: analogical thinking, attribute listing, discussion

 

Science students discuss intellectual freedom as it pertains to important events in the history of science (e.g. Scope’s trial, Galileo’s excommunication).

CrQ: 3 CtQ: 9 CoQ: 4
SD: independence in judgment, evaluation, justifying, arguing persuasively, taking other points of view, valuing complexity and novelty,
AT: discussion, case-based learning, just suppose

Fine arts academic team members work together to fill in matrices of important information about the artists and musicians they are studying.

CrQ: 2 CtQ: 9 CoQ: 5
SD: fluency, recognizing essential/nonessential, finding patterns, recognizing needed but omitted information
AT: attribute listing, discussion, brainstorming, summing up

Library club members decide on new materials to purchase for the library after being given a budget of $250.

CrQ: 6 CtQ: 7 CoQ: 3
SD: fluency, originality, dealing with complexity, setting goals
AT: brainstorming, discussion/debate

Students beginning library research web what they already know about their chosen topics to help generate useful search terms.

> CrQ: 8 CtQ: 7 CoQ: 0
SD: fluency, problem finding, attribute listing, discovering relationships
AT: brainstorming, webbing

Learning disabled and special needs students with speech deficiencies use creative dramatics and pantomime to become more aware of how their bodies interact with speech in communicating with others.

CrQ: 10 CtQ: 3 CoQ: 2
SD: flexibility, visualization, coping with novelty, risk-taking, attribute listing
AT: creative dramatics

Learning disabled and special needs students with speech deficiencies learn storytelling to help alleviate difficulties and gain confidence in oral communication.

CrQ: 10 CtQ: 3 CoQ: 2
SD: visualization, coping with novelty, risk-taking, sequencing, interpreting, evaluation
AT: creative dramatics

Advanced Placement English students write critical essays comparing the way historical and cultural events are represented in short stories and poems as opposed to the way they are represented in more "objective" sources.

CrQ: 5 CtQ: 10 CoQ: 0
SD: analogical thinking, flexibility, dealing with complexity, analysis, problem clarification, seeking support for opinions, evaluation
AT: analogical thinking, writing to think

 

 

Curriculum Brainstorm: Part Three

Reflection

People, who are not school media specialists, and even some of them, are likely to look upon my list of activities as a strange hodge-podge. Yes, I did coach an academic team; I did several in-services for teachers; I did some special units with elementary school students; and yes, once, I even substituted in an ABE class. Mostly, though, the list got to look like this because often teachers would come to me and say, "My class is studying X next month. Do you have any ideas?"

Even though I have no plans to go back to my life as a media specialist, I do intend to continue working in the school media field as an educator and consultant. For those reasons, I decided to evaluate activities I tried out instead of brainstorming things I could do in the future. I took this as an opportunity to reflect on my own instructional techniques so that when I get to the place where I am helping teachers and school media specialists develop and implement effective instruction, I can be better prepared.

Part One is a list of the most memorable or successful activities I used; everything on the list is something for which I was primarily responsible for planning and implementing. I made no attempt to organize or classify activities at this point. Once I had the list together, I decided to rate each activity on three criteria: that is, how much does each activity promote creative thinking, critical thinking, and cooperative learning? I totaled these quotients and then did a composite ranking of each activity, keeping only those which scored at least 15 out of 30 points. This list is found in Part Two. Then, for each activity, I tried to identify the important skills and dispositions that I feel the activity develops. Finally, I tried to categorize these activities into specific instructional techniques that we have discussed in class.

While, of course, the quotient system I devised is subjective, I found the results rather interesting. For example, I spent a lot of time developing the physics Web-site mock-up activity, and it was perhaps the most successful unit I was able to implement in terms of teacher satisfaction as well student satisfaction and learning. The students were quite motivated to work with this project and the products they presented were almost all quite original and well done. Everyone had fun. So, I was pleased to see this top the list when I totaled the quotients. Alternately, I was surprised to see the two activities related to the storytelling unit score less well. The storytelling unit was a joint venture among the speech pathologist, the LD/MIMH/EH teacher, and me in order to give students experiencing difficulties with oral communication a novel way to build skills and confidence. The success of the unit was apparent each of the three years we presented it through the reluctance-changed-to-eagerness-and-success each of the participating students experienced. I should mention that the culminating activity in this unit was for the students to go in pairs to one of the elementary schools in town and tell the stories they had learned to the students there.