P640: THINKING &
LEARNING IN SOCIAL CONTEXTS
Fall, 2002; ROOM 1201, Tuesday,
2:30-5:15, Section 6009
Department of
Educational Psychology
Curtis J. Bonk, Ph.D., CPA Office: 4022 W. W. Wright Education Bldg. Phone: 856-8353 (W) E-mail: CJBonk@indiana.edu Office Hours: Tuesdays 5:30-6:30, or as
arranged Instructional Assistant: ??? |
|
Course
Description/Purpose:
A major cause of poor performance on tasks that
require the generation of relevant subproblems, arguments, and summarizations
is that many prominent twentieth-century learning theories were based on the
acquisition of knowledge in simple, quantifiable terms. Most educational curricula of the 21st
century continues to emphasize the memorization of facts and the acquisition of
isolated sub-skills taught out-of-context and didactically. However, human learning is a social
enterprise and negotiation process, not a competitive, individual learning
one. As a result, a new educational
perspective is generating significant appeal among educators, parents, and
community leaders. This new approach,
known as "cognitive apprenticeship," is a unique synthesis of
cognitive, developmental, and social psychology research that replaces traditional
classroom learning with more rigorous and authentic educational environments.
A key goal of this course is that we achieve an
atmosphere resembling a productive, creative research group and quasi-think
tank for in-depth discussions. To
achieve this atmosphere, all class members must think critically about the
class readings and presentations, contribute original ideas to group
discussion, and reflect on how their interests (e.g., CEP, IST, ELPS, or
C&I) are influenced by research in this area. We shall examine Vygotskian and Piagetian theoretical linkages,
cognitive apprenticeships and guided participatory learning,
active/constructivist learning environments, social interaction and dialogue,
collaborative learning, problem/project-based learning, and educational reform. During this time, we may put together models
and diagrams of guided learning and the transfer of learning responsibility to
the student. Just how are strategies
modeled during social interaction internalized by learners? When and how should an instructor intervene
in the learning process? While finding
our answers, we will extensively explore and become familiar with such an
amalgam of recent educational research, that, by the end of the course, we may
understand why I call it “Thinking and Learning in Social Contexts.”
Objectives
(After the course, students should be able to):
Course Texts:
There are 15 books (you pick any two) as well as a Book of Readings.
A. Required Texts
(Pick 2; Note that the instructor will have a few loaner copies):
Other Choices:
B. Book of Readings,
C. J. Bonk (2002). Reading Packet for
P640. Available at Mr. Copy.
Weekly Topical
Outline:
1 (Sept 3rd): Introduction to Syllabus, 15 Books, and
Sociocultural Theory
2 (Sept 10th): First
Book: Cognitive Apprenticeship & Guided Participation Processes
3 (Sept 17th): First
Book Continued: Recent Educational Debates on Piagetian and Vygotskian Theory
4 (Sept 24th): Piaget,
Dewey, & Vygotsky in Debate: Historical and Cultural Underpinnings of
Theory
Presentation
by students from previous years (Brian, Jamie, Sonny, Manjari, Noriko)
5 (Oct
1st): Vygotsky: Scaffolding, Zones
of Proximal Development, and Dynamic Assessment
6 (Oct 8th): Neo-Vygotskian
Ideas: Situated Cognition, Anchored Instruction, & Reciprocal Tchg
7 (Oct 15th): Activity
Settings and Cultural Tools/Artifacts (T#3: Draft)
8 (Oct 22nd): Dilemmas
in Measuring Social Interaction: Peer tutoring and mentor assistance
9 (Oct 29th): Dilemmas
in Measuring Social Inter: Conversations, Talk, and Tutoring (T#3: Final)
Due (it or): DIE Assignment
10 (Nov 5th): Building Cognitive
Apprenticeships in the Content Areas
Roll the Die: Students to present best DIE
stuff, even if apparently dead.
11 (Nov 12th): Emerging Techniques:
Collaborative Writing and Cooperative Reading (T#4: Select)
12 (Nov 19th): Project, Problem, and Case-Based
Learning Communities
13 (Nov 26th): Socioculturally-Based
Communities of Learners (AERA Week–Curt gone)
14 (Dec 3rd): Second Book & Recap (Select
book) (Task #4: Final)
Due: Do (that's the
"Due-Do") Assignment; Student Research Presentations
15 (Dec 10th): Second Book & Recap (Finish
book) (Task #4: Final)
Student
Book Reports & More Research Presentations
(meet
with my P600 class to celebrate the end of the semester?)
Sample terminology of
this course:
Summary of Course (A.)
Grading and (B.) Activities:
As explained below, in this class students will
be expected to read the material (Task #1), discuss it with their peers (Task
#2), depict their understanding of it (Task #3), and use it (Task #4). In the fourth task, students will code and
analyze a situation rich in social interaction and dialogue processes or write
a comparable research proposal.
Although there is an escape clause (Task #5), it is expected that you
will perform these tasks as scheduled in this syllabus or as negotiated with
the instructor.
A. Course Grading
(Based on The R3'd Grading Method):
1. 40
pts READ--Interpreter of Signs and Symbols (20% of grade).
2. 40
pts DISCUSS--Peer Supporter, Dialogue Partner, and Negotiator of Meaning (20%).
3. 60
pts DISPLAY--Designer of Internalization-Externalization (DIE) Exhibit: (30%).
4. 60
pts DO--Analyzer of Scaffolding, Mediated Lrng, or Zones of Proximal Dev.
(30%).
200
pts Total
A+ = ???
(Excellent plus) B- = 160 (Good minus)
A = 187
(Excellent) C+
= 154 (Satisfactory plus)
A- = 180
(Excellent minus) C
= 147 (Satisfactory)
B+ = 174 (Good plus) C-
= 140 (Satisfactory minus)
B = 167
(Good) F = no work received or inadequate
B. Course Activities--(1) READ, (2) DISCUSS, (3)
DISPLAY, AND (4) DO:
1. READ--Interpreter of Signs & Symbols
(20% of grade). You will be given a
checklist to indicate which assigned articles were beneficial as well as extra
readings you did. You must read three
articles or chapters each week plus five of the tidbits or skipped
articles. You will be asked to react to
the articles you have read as well as rate them.
2. DISCUSS--Peer Supporter, Dialogue Partner,
and Negotiator of Meaning (25% of grade). This
task includes attending class, leading class discussion, general
participation/effort, and other investigative activities. Once or twice during the course, each
student will lead class discussion.
Volunteer discussion leaders may be solicited to take responsibility for
the following week's readings. As
discussion leader, you would be responsible for coming up with several
thought-provoking questions from the articles you read to get discussion
started. Thought questions can range
from very general issues, to extremely specific details, to thoughts bridging
most of the readings up to that point in the course. About 5-10 typed questions with enough copies for the class is
best. We may use Sitescape Forum or
Oncourse for these discussions.
3. DISPLAY--Designer of
Internalization-Externalization (DIE) Exhibit:
(30% of grade).
I want to know two things here. First of all, how have you interpreted the
history of this field (according to the readings). Secondly, how does this field fit into your main area(s) of
interest. I want you to depict both of
these two learning elements visually and sequentially. In effect, you are to chart or outline the
history of this field from your viewpoint (from left to right) at the top of a
11 X 17 sheet of paper. Below this
representation, I want to see your portrayal of the field according to your
personal interests or research agenda.
In addition, you must attach a two-page or so single-spaced commentary
describing the figures, insights, and ideas in your DIE exhibit. Basically, I want to find out what you have
internalized about the field in general and also what has made the most sense
from your prior knowledge or point of view.
First drafts are due for class and peer review on October 15th and final
timeline reports are due October 29th.
Don't kill yourself over this one!!!
These externalization activities will be graded
on 6 dimensions on a 1 (low) to 10 (high) scale:
1. Ideas (info richness, elaboration,
originality, interesting, unique analogies b/t top and bottom charts)
2. Sequential Flow (coherence, unity,
organization, logical sequence, understandable style, clarity)
3. Completeness (adequate info presented, valid
pts, fulfills task intent, some breadth and depth)
4. Relevancy (related to class topics,
meaningful links to class, descriptions correspond to picture)
5. Relationships Drawn (indicates understanding,
verbal descriptions, connections)
6. Overall External Representations (depth,
breadth, development, impressiveness, accurate portrayal)
To help supplement this internalization process,
I feel free to insert any of the following items underneath it in a packet or portfolio. None of these are required for the 60
points, however. These supplemental
activities are listed in order of importance.
Portfolio underlying the
Internalization-Externalization Exercise might include:
4. DO--Analyzer of Scaffolding, Mediated
Learning, and/or Zones of Proximal Development (30%):
I want you to be an active, autonomous
learner. Consequently, this final
activity gives you some options while targeting application of the
material. Note that Option
"A" is preferred and also that the required page length varies by
option. For any option, you are to tell
the instructor your intent either orally or in writing. Approval for your final project is needed by
November 19th. Final papers/reports are
due Dec 3rd or 10th.
Grading Scale from Options A, B, and C
(Note 1 (low) to 10 (high) for each of the following criteria):
1.
Review of the Problem and Literature (interesting, relevant, current,
organized, thorough)
2.
Research Activity/Design/Topic (clear, doable/practical, detailed, important
research q's)
3.
Implications/Future Directions (generalizability, options available, research
focus)
4. Overall Richness of
Ideas (richness of information, elaboration, originality, unique coding)
5. Overall Coherence
(unity, organization, logical sequence, synthesis, style, accurate coding)
6. Overall Completeness
(adequate info presented, explicit, relevant, precise, valid pts)
Option A. Research Activity:
(8-16 double spaced pages)
Here, I want you to code or analyze a situation
rich in social interaction and dialogue processes or one wherein you might
capture the mechanisms of minute cognitive change or the processes leading to
the internalization of cognitive strategies.
Stated another way, I want you to do something with the material we are
learning. For instance, you might
analyze mother-child or daycare-related situations for the degree of shared
responsibility for learning, teacher or peer scaffolding, negotiations of
meaning, internalization of cognitive strategies, and activities that appear
within or beyond one's zone of development.
This action could take place in formal or informal settings and may
include one or more partners. Possible
activities include observing and analyzing the following for teacher-student,
mentor-mentee, student-student, or student-tool interactions.
Possible Data Sources:
Option B. Research Proposal:
(14-20 double spaced pages)
In this option, students must write a paper on a
topic related to thinking or learning in a social context that: (1) extends or
modifies the research of someone else, or (2) suggests a totally unique but
reasonable research project/study. It
can be either a quantitative intervention or qualitative study. Your proposal can be related to any relevant
age group.
Option C. Grant Proposal: (See me for more info; 14-20 double spaced
pages). Thoroughly read a topic area and then draft a research proposal to an
institution offering grants in an area where you work (or would like to
work). You pick the funding agency,
title, and monies needed ($2,000-$200,000; it's your call). In the proposal, you should discuss such
things as the topic, timeline, procedures, implications, and budget. An extensive literature review and associated
research questions should ground your proposal, while the names and addresses
of 3 reviewers and your resume should end your proposal.
Option D. Other: There are options to the above, but see me
on any options you might think of.
Sample Formats:
Option A. Research Activity:
(8-16 double spaced pages)
I.
Title Page (Name, affiliation, topic title, acknowledgments)
II.
Topic Literature and Method (7-14 pages)
1. Research
topic & materials;
2. Brief
statement of problem and why important (1-2 pages)
3. Brief
review of the relevant literature (3-4 pages)
4. Methods:
(2-6 pages)
a. Subjects
& design (i.e., who/how selected);
b. Materials/setting
(i.e., hard/software, text)
c. Procedure
(i.e., how data was obtained)
d. Coding
Schemes & Dep. measures/instruments (i.e., how segment/code data)
e. Analyses
or comparisons
III.
Results and Discussion: 1.Preliminary Results; 2. Discussion of results (4-8
pages)
IV.
References (APA style: see syllabus for example)
V.
Appendices (e.g., pictures, charts, figures, models, tests, scoring criteria,
coding procedures)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Option B. Research Proposal:
(14-20 double spaced pages)
I.
Title Page (Name, affiliation, topic title, acknowledgments)
II.
Review of the Literature (6-12 pages)
1. Intro
to Topic/Problem (purpose, history, importance) (1 page)
2. Review
of Literature (contrast relevant literature on the topic) (6-9 pages)
3. Statement
of Hypotheses/Research Q's (what do you expect to occur) (1 page)
III.
Method Section (3-7 pages)
1. Subjects
and design (i.e., sample, who and how assigned to groups)
2. Materials/setting
(i.e., hardware, software, text, models, figures)
3. Dependent
measures/instruments (i.e., tests)
4. Procedure
(i.e., training)
5. Other
(i.e., coding, other materials)
6. Exp
analyses or comparisons
IV.
Results and Discussion (OPTIONAL): 1. Antic/dummied results; 2. Discussion of
results
V.
References (APA style: see syllabus for example)
VI. Appendices (e.g., pictures, charts,
figures, models, tests, scoring criteria, coding procedures)
5. Escape Clause:
Just like Austin Powers, Madonna, Tiger Woods,
Tom Hanks, Dick Cheney, the Indianapolis Colts, and Britney Spears, you have an
escape clause in your contract. The
escape clause here relates to Assignments #3 or #4. If you go to a relevant conference during the fall and attend 4-5
sessions related to sociocultural theory, write a one page summary of your
activities, and report on these to the class, you can skip one of these two
assignments. Or if you could become significantly
involved in an AERA, MidWERA, APA or a similar conference paper or symposium
proposal as a result of this class, you can skip one of these two
assignments. Or if you interview 1-2
famous sociocultural theorists during the semester, reflect upon and summarize
these, and then share this with the class, you can skip one of these two
assignments. Or if you help someone
analyze research from a sociocultural perspective and submit this publication
or for a conference during the semester, you can skip one of these two
assignments. Or if you propose a new
model or perspective for the field and present it to the class...Or if…Or if…Or
if…
Weekly Course Readings: (try to read 3 articles
or chapters per week)
Week 1 (Sept 3rd): Introduction to Syllabus, 15 Books,
and Sociocultural Theory
1.
Glossary for P600, Deborah Hamilton (1994).
Week 2 (Sept 10th): 15 Books Continued:
Cognitive Apprenticeship & Guided Participation
1.
Your book—pick 3-4 chapters (If Rogoff, pages 1-110 (Esp. Chapters 2, 4, &
5)
Tidbits:
2. John
Dewey, (1897). My Pedagogic Creed, The School Journal, 54(3), 77-80.
3. APA
Presidential Task Force on Psychology in Education/McREL, (1993).
Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for school redesign and
reform, Washington, DC: APA.
4. Britain:
New Skool Rules, Ok? (1998, Feb. 7th). The Economist, 57-58.
Week 3 (Sept 17th): Recent Educational Debates
on Piagetian and Vygotskian Theory
1. Your book, If Rogoff;
pp. 111-210 (Esp. Chapt. 7, 9, & 10)
Tidbits:
2. Wenger,
E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000, Jan-Feb). Communities of practice: the
organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 139-145.
3. Wenger,
E. C. (2002). Supporting communities of practice: Executive summary. From: Supporting
communities of practice: A survey of community-oriented technologies. See also, http://www.ewenger.com/tech/executive_summary.htm
and http://www.ewenger.com/tech/
4. Jerome
Bruner’s Invited address, (1996, Sept.). Celebrating Piaget and Vygotsky: An
exercise in dialectic. From Growing
Mind Conference: 100th Anniversary of Piaget’s Birth, Geneva,
Switzerland.
5. Cole,
M., & Wertsch, J. (1998, January 31st). Beyond the
individual-social antimony in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. (found at:
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~ALock/virtual/colevyg.htm; for additional papers:
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~ALock/virtual/project2.htm; or
http://www.massey.ac.nz/~ALock/virtual/welcome.htm)
Week 4 (Sept 24th): Dewey, Piaget, & Vygotsky
in Debates: Historical/Cultural Underpinnings of Theory
1. Marti,
E., (1996). Mechanisms of internalisation and externalisation of knowledge in
Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories. In A.
Tryphon, & J. Voneche (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky: The social genesis of
thought (pp. 57-83). East Sussex, UK:
Psychology Press.
2. Prawat,
R. S. (2000). Dewey meets the “Mozart of
Psychology” in Moscow: The untold -story.
American Educational Research
Association, 37(3), 663-696.
3. Prawat,
R. S. (2002, June-July). Dewey and Vygotsky viewed through the rearview
mirror—and dimly at that. Educational Researcher, 31(5), 16-20.
a. O’Brien,
L. M. (2002, June-July). A Response to…37(3), pp. 21-23.
b. Glassman,
M. (2002, June-July). Experience and responding. 37(3), pp. 24-27.
4. Davydov,
V. V. (1995). The influence of L. S. Vygotsky on education theory, research,
and practice. Educational Researcher,
24(3), 12-21.
5. Confrey,
J. (1995). How compatible are radical constructivism, sociocultural approaches,
& social construct? In Steffe &
Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in ed. (pp.
185-225). Erlbaum.
Tidbits:
6. Blanck,
G. (1990). Vygotsky: The man & his cause.
In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky & educ: Instructional implics &
applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 31-58). Cambridge.
7. Vygodskaia,
G. L. (1995). Remembering father. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 57-59.
8. Ayman-Nolley,
S. (1992). Vygotsky’s perspective on the development of imagination and
creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 5(1), 77-85.
Week 5 (Oct 1st): Vygotsky: Scaffolding, Zones
of Proximal Development, and Dynamic Assessment
1. Stone,
A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In Forman et al. (Eds.). Contexts for
learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development. Oxford.
2. Gaffney,
J. S., & Anderson, R. C. (1991). Two-tiered scaffolding: Congruent
processes of teaching and learning. In E. H. Hiebert (Ed.), Literacy for a
diverse society: Perspectives, practices, & policies. NY: Teachers College Press.
3. Lunt,
I. (1993). The practice of assessment.
In H. Daniels (Ed.), Charting the agenda: Educational activity after
Vygotsky (Chapter 7: pp. 145-170). NY:
Routledge.
4. Shepard,
L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Ed Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
5. Allal,
L., & Ducrey, G. P. (2000). Assessment of—or in—the zone of proximal
development. Learning and Instruction, 10,
137-152.
Tidbits:
6. Kozulin,
A., & Falk, L. (1995). Dynamic cognitive assessment of the child. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 4(6), 192-196.
7. Goldstein,
L. S. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the
co-construction of mind. American
Educational Research Association. 36(3), 647-673.
Week 6 (Oct 8th): Neo-Vygotskian Ideas: Situated
Cognition, Anchored Instruction, & Reciprocal Tchg
Tidbits:
Week 7 (Oct 15th): Activity Settings and
Cultural Tools/Artifacts
Tidbits:
Week 8 (Oct 22nd): Dilemmas in Measuring Social
Interaction: Peer Tutoring & Mentor Assistance
Tidbits:
Week 9 (Oct 29th): Dilemmas in Meas Social
Inter: Conversations, Talk, & Tutoring
Week 10 (Nov 5th): Building Cognitive
Apprenticeships in the Content Areas
Week 11 (Nov 12th): Emerging Techniques:
Collaborative Writing and Cooperative Reading
Tidbit:
Week 12 (Nov 19th): Project, Problem, and
Case-Based Learning Communities
Tidbit:
Week 13 (Nov 26th): Socioculturally-Based
Communities of Learners and Resources
Tidbit:
Week 14 (Dec 3rd): Student Self-Selection Week
& Recap (Select from books above)
Week 15 (Dec 10th): Student Self-Selection Week
& Recap (SAME CHOICES AS WEEK 14)